<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New Contrarian &#187; Alan Greenspan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newcontrarian.com/tag/alan-greenspan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newcontrarian.com</link>
	<description>Just another Newcontrarian.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Chastened Greenspan</title>
		<link>http://newcontrarian.com/2008/10/23/a-chastened-greenspan/</link>
		<comments>http://newcontrarian.com/2008/10/23/a-chastened-greenspan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damir Marusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americasfuture.org/conventionalfolly/?p=1824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating stuff coming out of Alan Greenspan&#8217;s testimony today, difficult stuff for dyed-in-the-wool libertarians to countenance, I&#8217;d imagine. Snippets from the WSJ story: &#8220;Those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholders&#8217; equity (myself especially) are in a state of shocked disbelief,&#8221; according to Mr. Greenspan. &#8230; But when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating stuff coming out of Alan Greenspan&#8217;s testimony today, difficult stuff for dyed-in-the-wool libertarians to countenance, I&#8217;d imagine. Snippets from the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122476545437862295.html"><em>WSJ</em> story</a>:</p>

<blockquote>&#8220;Those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholders&#8217; equity (myself especially) are in a state of shocked disbelief,&#8221; according to Mr. Greenspan.

&#8230;

But when Mr. Waxman pressed &#8220;were you wrong&#8221; about the benefits of deregulation, Mr. Greenspan responded, &#8220;partially.&#8221; The &#8220;flaw&#8221; in the assumptions he had over four decades, Mr. Greenspan said, was that lending institutions themselves were best able to protect the interest of their shareholders.

Thus what looked like a solid edifice to his thinking broke down, Mr. Greenspan said.</blockquote>

<p>I look forward to seeing how more orthodox libertarians around the web parse his remarks. More thoughts on this in the coming days from me as well, time permitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newcontrarian.com/2008/10/23/a-chastened-greenspan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

