<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New Contrarian &#187; Bruce Reidel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newcontrarian.com/tag/bruce-reidel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newcontrarian.com</link>
	<description>Just another Newcontrarian.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan, Pakistan, Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://newcontrarian.com/2009/03/05/pakistan-pakistan-pakistan/</link>
		<comments>http://newcontrarian.com/2009/03/05/pakistan-pakistan-pakistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damir Marusic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Reidel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americasfuture.org/conventionalfolly/?p=4113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Klein reports that Bruce Riedel, head of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Af-Pak&#8221; strategy review, thinks we should focus our energies on the Pakistan problem: “Afghanistan pales in comparison to the problems in Pakistan,” said an official familiar with Riedel’s thinking. “Our primary goal has to be to shut down the al-Qaeda and Taliban safe havens on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Klein <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1883220,00.html">reports</a> that Bruce Riedel, head of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Af-Pak&#8221; strategy review, thinks we should focus our energies on the Pakistan problem:</p>

<blockquote><strong><span style="font-weight: normal">“Afghanistan pales in comparison to the problems in Pakistan,</span></strong>” said an official familiar with Riedel’s thinking. “Our primary goal has to be to shut down the al-Qaeda and Taliban safe havens on the Pakistan side of the border. If that can be accomplished, then the insurgency in Afghanistan becomes manageable.”</blockquote>

<p>That&#8217;s music to my ears, as far as it goes. A bit further on, presumably the same source clarifies:</p>

<blockquote>“Obviously, we’re not going to invade Pakistan,” said a senior member of the Riedel review. “We have to convince the Pakistanis to do the job. But we haven’t had much luck with that in the past.”</blockquote>

<p>That is the crux of it, of course: there are no good solutions for Pakistan. Nevertheless, I still don&#8217;t see what an attempt at Afghan state-building gets us, except dead soldiers and an even more stretched budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newcontrarian.com/2009/03/05/pakistan-pakistan-pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

